|
Boost Users : |
From: Oliver Schoenborn (oliver.schoenborn_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-07 14:22:47
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Noel Yap
>
> On 3/7/06, Andy Little <andy_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > I guess so, except high altitude mountain climbing over the AST using
> > copious supplies of oxygen might be nearer the mark than walking. As I
> > understand it C++ is not beloved by compiler writers for this reason!
> > I guess it all comes down to the exact definition of "a C++
> > parser"and what you want to do with its output.
>
> Some things I had in mind were:
> - code beautification
> - static dependency analysis for link- or compile-compatibility
> - other static code analysis
> - creation of refactoring tools
>
> Noel
Have you looked at silvercity http://silvercity.sourceforge.net/?
Oliver
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net