Re: [Boost-users] WG: defining a function<>-object with a returnvalue of the same type (recursive declaration)

From: Michael Fawcett (michael.fawcett_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-03 09:26:40

On 5/3/06, Oliver.Kowalke_at_[hidden] <Oliver.Kowalke_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Hmm - I would use boost::function instead of declaring a
> function-pointer object by myself.

Go for it.  I just pasted the code from Herb Sutter's article that
showed how to accomplish what you wanted with a function object and a
function pointer.  You could probably move that into a function<> if
that's what you need.

-Michael Fawcett