Re: [Boost-users] Fusion 2. Vector Example

From: John Christopher (jcxxr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-03 18:10:29

Joel,
I was wondering if "at_c" is only a convenience version of "at" or there is 
a deeper difference?
In other words, is
std::cout << at_c<0>(v) << std::endl;
fully equivalent to
std::cout << at<boost::mpl::int_<0> >(v) << std::endl;
Thanks for this very nice library
JCR

"Joel de Guzman" <joel_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
news:e3b90h$au5$1_at_sea.gmane.org...
> John Christopher wrote:
>> Hello,
>> At the bottom of the page
>> http://spirit.sourceforge.net/dl_more/fusion_v2/libs/fusion/doc/html/fusion/sequences/containers/vector.html
>> there is the following example:
>> vector<int, float> v(12, 5.5f);
>> std::cout << at<0>(v) << std::endl;
>> std::cout << at<1>(v) << std::endl;
>> The example as such does not compile, Shouldn't it be:std::cout <<
>> at_c<0>(v) << std::endl;orstd::cout << at<boost::mpl::int_<0> >(v) <<
>> std::endl;
>
> Yes, at_c is correct. Fixed in CVS. Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
> -- 
> Joel de Guzman
> http://www.boost-consulting.com
> http://spirit.sf.net