Re: [Boost-users] [review] Boost.Fusion

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-16 08:58:48

Joel de Guzman <joel_at_[hidden]> writes:

>> It will catch up :-) On a side note, it seems the tests were run with 
>> gcc 3.4. IIRC, gcc 4 and beyond introduced a couple of interesting 
>> optimizations so I wonder how far do those go towards narrowing the gap.
>
> I would love to see better numbers for g++.

Building a later G++ under cygwin is pretty easy if you know what to
do.  That's how I stay abreast of G++ developments.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com