Re: [Boost-users] ADL comment in noncopyable

From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-14 14:31:04

me22 wrote:
> On 6/14/06, Steven E. Harris <seh_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 
>>me22 <me22.ca_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>
>>>Presumably if noncopyable were defined in namespace boost, then
>>>function calls involving classes deriving from noncopyable would get
>>>namespace boost added to the ADL scopes in which the function is
>>>looked up.
>>>
>>
>>Even if the derivation is private, as it should be for such an
>>implementation detail?

Yes, even if the derivation is private.

-- 
Eric Niebler
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com