|
Boost Users : |
From: Jabe (tahoma_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-22 12:05:44
hello,
i try to create a xml archive that fit our needs. the default xml
serializer
handles not the format i would like to implement.
some differences are:
- primitive types (int, float, ...) should be written as xml attributes
- array types should not provide any parent xml element, all array
elements
will be serialized as childs from the element containing the array
- tagnames should always contain the classname
- parent classes should create a new xml child element
- and some more, but so far
as an example the default xml code looks like this:
<foo class_name="Class1" class_id="1">
<name>example</name>
<container class_id="2">
<count>2</count>
<item class_id_reference="2">
<a>123</a>
</item>
<item class_id_reference="3" class_name="Class3">
<b>456</b>
</item>
</foo>
i would like this output:
<Class1 role="foo" name="example">
<Class2 role="container" a="123" />
<Class3 role="container" b="456" />
</Class1>
is that possible with the current boost::serialization and boost::archive
libraries?
i tried to derive all baseclasses of xml_oarchive and reimplemented it,
without
success.
maybe a first question: why don't i get a classname for each serialized
object in
common_oarchive::save_override(const class_name_type & t, int)?
sometimes i get a class_id, sometimes a class_reference_id and so on.
classnames
are offered rarely.
regards,
jabe
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net