|
Boost Users : |
From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-10 19:24:41
Robert Ramey wrote:
>> Clever! But again, what if Y is already obsolete at version 2?
>
> LOL - once an object of class Y is stored in an archive and
> kept around - by definition - it can't be obsolete. Obsolete
> suggests it will never be used - archiving suggest it will be.
That's one way to look at it. Your archive just adds and adds
and accumulates data over time. Yet, if you think outside the box,
a skippable archive allows you to subtract data and flag some data
as obsolete. No one is ever so brilliant as to plan from version 1
what happens with version 100 :) If adding is a possibility, I do
not see why subtracting is not.
Regards,
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net