|
Boost Users : |
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-10 19:36:45
Peter Dimov wrote:
> Joel de Guzman wrote:
>> Peter Dimov wrote:
>>
>>> I can't help but wonder: if some parts of your v1 format are so
>>> completely redundant as to allow you to reconstruct the original
>>> data even if you skip them, what was the point of writing them in
>>> the first place?
>> Here's one scenario (I'm sure there are others): Your class uses a
>> 3rd party library called Y. Later, you decide to replace it with
>> a better engine using a library called Z.
>
> Still not getting it. Do you have an example?
Another use case... If you make two versions of a product, one a
demo/trial and another the full release. One person makes a data file in
the release version and sends it to a friend who has the demo. There
happens to be a feature not available in the demo which has an impact on
the data format.
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net