Re: [Boost-users] interested to know your opinion on possible feature

From: Ovanes Markarian (om_boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-11 05:34:35

On Tue, July 11, 2006 01:26, Sebastian Redl wrote:
> Ovanes Markarian wrote:
>
>>In my current project is a need to implement an optional type, this type is considered to be
>> lazy.
>>I am wondering why C++ or Boost do not offer this possibility.
>>
>>
> In what way does Boost.Optional fail to meet your needs?
>
> Sebastian Redl
>
>

Thanks for your reply. I will take a look at this class in a more detailed manner. I saw it
already, but thought it is not what I need. After some inspection I start to realize, that it is
indeed what I might need. Thanks again.

With Kind Regards,

Ovanes Markarian