Boost Users :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-24 10:42:42

Next message: Johan Råde: "Re: [Boost-users] [array] VC++ 7.1 bug and a proposed fix"
Previous message: John Maddock: "Re: [Boost-users] [array] VC++ 7.1 bug and a proposed fix"
In reply to: John Maddock: "Re: [Boost-users] [array] VC++ 7.1 bug and a proposed fix"
Next in thread: Johan Råde: "Re: [Boost-users] [array] VC++ 7.1 bug and a proposed fix"
Reply: Johan Råde: "Re: [Boost-users] [array] VC++ 7.1 bug and a proposed fix"
Reply: John Maddock: "Re: [Boost-users] [array] VC++ 7.1 bug and a proposed fix"

John Maddock wrote:

> Boost.Array is not intended to be either copy-constructable or
> assignable, so instantiating a function returning an array-by-value
> *should* fail to compile.

What makes you think so?

Next message: Johan Råde: "Re: [Boost-users] [array] VC++ 7.1 bug and a proposed fix"
Previous message: John Maddock: "Re: [Boost-users] [array] VC++ 7.1 bug and a proposed fix"
In reply to: John Maddock: "Re: [Boost-users] [array] VC++ 7.1 bug and a proposed fix"
Next in thread: Johan Råde: "Re: [Boost-users] [array] VC++ 7.1 bug and a proposed fix"
Reply: Johan Råde: "Re: [Boost-users] [array] VC++ 7.1 bug and a proposed fix"
Reply: John Maddock: "Re: [Boost-users] [array] VC++ 7.1 bug and a proposed fix"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net