Re: [Boost-users] [license] Why is the Boost license not anofficial Open Source license?

From: Sohail Somani (s.somani_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-27 14:10:44

> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden] 
> [mailto:boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of 
> Gennaro Prota
> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:05 AM
> To: boost-users_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [license] Why is the Boost license 
> not anofficial Open Source license?
>
> With a terminology stress which (to me) twists the meaning of "free
> software" it could be classified as "non-copylefted free software"
> (which basically means, anyone can redistribute it under a non free
> license; in the case of boost they can do that only if they don't
> redistribute the source code)

So if you use boost in your interfaces, you've gotta redistribute your
source code too?