Re: [Boost-users] boost program_options

From: Ovanes Markarian (om_boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-08-28 08:17:38

Volodya,
sorry to write about different issue to this post. But I did not get any reply on this issue:

http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2006/08/109087.php

Can you please confirm, that you have registered it and will include a bug-fix?

With Kind Regards,
Ovanes Markarian

On Mon, August 28, 2006 14:04, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> On Monday 28 August 2006 15:49, you wrote:
>> Hello,
>
> Hi,
> please send all Boost questions to some mailing list, not in private.
>
>>
>> in your tutorial for program_options at the boost site you talk about
>> the method allow_unregistered() lite this:
>>
>> parsed_options parsed =
>>     command_line_parser(argv,
>> argc).options(desc).allow_unregistered().run();
>>
>>
>> However, I'm using boost 1.33 and the command_line_parser class uses
>> private inheritence from the detail::cmdline class, which makes the
>> allow_unregistered() method unavailable for public use. What is the
>> deal?
>
> That's a bug in 1.33. The operation of allow_unregistered was unit-tested, but
> since unit test used detail::cmdline directly, the fact that the method is
> not accessible in command_line_parser went undetected. I believe it's fixed
> in CVS.
>
> - Volodya
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>