Re: [Boost-users] 3 times slower than c++?

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-11 13:47:13

Andy Little wrote:
> Hey No offence intended, but  AFAIK( which isnt well) Python is built
> to be lightweight and versatile rather than for speed performance.

That's not what he's asking: his C++ code is apparently slower when called
from python than when run standalone.

This is off-topic for Boost though, even if it's actually true (I'd like to
know how the measurement were carried out, or rather I wouldn't, because
it's off topic!).

This should be moved to a more appropriate discussion list.

Your friendly neighbourhood moderator,

John.