Boost logo

Boost Users :

From: Glenn (eponymousalias_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-01 16:08:57


JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z wrote:
> ----- Mensaje original -----
>> ...
>> I guess there is a bug in boost/multi_index/sequenced_index.hpp.
>> ...
>
> This is indeed a bug, and a gross one I must embarrassingly admit :)
> Also, the proposed patch is the way to go. Thank you very much for
> spotting this, I'll be committing the fixes next Monday (during
> weekends I'm CVS-disabled.) FYI, the same problem also shows at
> other places like random-access indices and some other ops like
> merge, yet the reference docs use the correct expression &x==this
> everywhere, it's so disturbing, I wonder how this could go unnoticed
> for so long.

Well, ask yourself why your package's regression tests don't
cover these cases -- and make sure they do, for all of whatever
code changes you're about to make. This is critical for my own
project; I was just about to commit to using multi_index, but
now I'm not so sure of its reliability.

I take it this would mean that, at a minimum, I would be unable
to use the 1.32.0 release already installed with the OS, and I
would need to pull directly from CVS after your changes go in,
at least until 1.34.0 shows up.

That makes me wonder as well: is there some way to post a
warning on the Boost site that this package is broken in the
current releases?

Glenn


Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net