Re: [Boost-users] Suggestion for boost`s smart pointers

From: David Klein (dave_chp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-28 19:55:05

Sohail Somani wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden] 
>> [mailto:boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of David Klein
>>
>> Sohail Somani wrote:
>>     
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden] 
>>>> [mailto:boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of mark cox
>>>>
>>>> wow, this seems like a great idea, a scoped_ptr with deleter 
>>>> would be v.useful.
>>>> mark
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> I've been thinking something like (just something I hacked 
>>>       
>> together just
>>     
>>> now). Not sure if there is a nicer way.
>>>
>>>       
> [snip]
>   
>> +1 vote for this idea :)
>>
>> i actually kind of did this for my current project,
>> because i needed a custom deleter for scoped_ptr,
>> when shared_ptr was to much overhead...
>>     
>
> As did I, but it was not for performance but for readability. Shared
> pointers mean... Shared. Scoped don't.
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>
>   

yep exactly,
thatswhy i "ripped" scoped_ptr out of boost and added my custom_deleter 
stuff.
(i only *thought* about shared_ptr to do the job)

so are there any objections about adding this feature to scoped_ptr?

--
regards dave