|
Boost Users : |
From: vermaaso (vermaaso_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-12 12:54:04
Hi Robert,
thanks for your quick reply.
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 09:20:49AM -0800, Robert Ramey wrote:
>
> a) The usage of a function string serialize(...) is not incorrect, but it
> could be confusing to a compiler with an issue with overloading. At the
> very least it makes the example harder to follow and might make error
> messages undecipherable.
Ok, I'll fix that. Just to be sure ..
> b) The following usage of string stream makes me wonder:
>
> The order of destruction is:
>
> return (copy? string)
> destroy archive - this might add closing characters to the archive
> destroy string stream
>
> So I'm not certain that the string contains all the characters added to the
> archive.
That could make sense. I'll try it out tomorow at work and I will
also test your reformulated example.
Thanks again,
Oscar
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net