|
Boost Users : |
From: Clark S. Cox III (clarkcox3_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-15 16:26:41
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
A couple of questions:
Is there any rational behind the fact that boost::detail::atomic_count
doesn't have a default constructor?
For what reason is atomic_count an implementation detail, and not
available for general use? (i.e. why is it in boost::detail, and not
boost::)
- --
Clark S. Cox III
clarkcox3_at_[hidden]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFgxMRXkPInUR5a8wRApfMAJoCiK/xH7K0u2GZnn3QoEk42bqznwCfQ9r0
s60aQuCL2IC1CB1Xi5uhBqQ=
=roHz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net