|
Boost Users : |
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-18 14:11:16
vermaaso wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> I'm still working on running the tests. It looks like the
> serialization tests all passed, and currently I'm running all tests
> of the complete source tree. I noticed that a lot of tests in the
> type_traits have failed, but BOOST_IS_ABSTRACT should solve that,
> right ?
BOOST_IS_ABSTRACT "solves" it for the serialization library. Actually
it would be better to say BOOST_IS_ABSTRACT works around
the issue for compilers which don't pass the is_abstract type trait test.
I made BOOST_IS_ABSTRACT so that
there would be an "is_abstract" trait for compilers which didn't support
the automatic one. I don't know if BOOST_IS_ABSTRACT has been
used by other libraries for such a purpose.
I would expect that for compilers which support is_abstract related
type traits tests would fail but that libraries which depend upon
this trait would document usage of BOOST_IS_ABSTRACT is
permit the library to function inspite if lack of such a trait. I don't
know if there are any libraries other than serialization which
require this.
Robert Ramey
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net