|
Boost Users : |
From: Ovanes Markarian (om_boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-10 16:18:28
Ahh, sorry I also forget to mention, to make linear derivation as you wish,
you must always produce a unique type, which is ensured with the pair_c
construct.
Otherwise you get the following simplified scenario:
template <class T>
struct DataField {
T data;
};
class SomeClass : public DataField<int>, DataField<int>, DataField<int>
{
...
};
In such a case compiler will produce a warning, which states that it will
only derive once from DataField<int>.
With Kind Regards,
Ovanes
-----Original Message-----
From: Ovanes Markarian [mailto:om_boost_at_[hidden]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 9:30 PM
To: boost-users_at_[hidden]
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [boost.mpl] Implementing a numeric index access
to fields of a composite class created with mpl::inherit_linearly
Hi!
you could use an mpl::pair type to produce a static mapping of int value to
type:
mpl::pair<mpl::int_<0>, int>
This is a little bit ugly, to write such a big construct, so you can write
the following construct
template<int N, class T>
struct pair_c : mpl::pair<mpl::int_<N>, T> {};
Actually pair_c could be your DataField struct, so you can add the T
instance to it:
template<int N, class T>
struct pair_c : mpl::pair<mpl::int_<N>, T> {
T dataField;
};
Now you can define a vector of pair types as follows:
mpl::vector<pair_c<0, int>, pair_c<1, int>, pair_c<2, int> > my_vector;
we use in this sample pair_c to make any type unique, dependent on the
position in the vector.
The next step would be to define the class with linear inheritance:
template<class Seq>
struct linear_inherited :
boost::mpl::inherit_linearly
<
Seq
, boost::mpl::inherit<boost::mpl::_1, boost::mpl::_2>
>::type
{};
But now you would need the access function. I suggest to integrate this
function as a linear_inherited member:
template<class Seq>
struct linear_inherited :
boost::mpl::inherit_linearly
<
Seq
, boost::mpl::inherit<boost::mpl::_1, boost::mpl::_2>
>::type
{
template<long N>
typename boost::mpl::at_c<Seq, N>::type::second& nth_field()
{
typedef typename boost::mpl::at_c<Seq, N>::type* ptr_type;
ptr_type ptr = static_cast<ptr_type>(this);
return ptr->dataField;
}
};
When this function is a member you save some effor on passing the sequence
type to its specialization, otherwise it will not know which type is meant.
Let me explain this function:
mpl has the at metafunction, which can access the Nth element of a static
vector. Here this function is used to calculate the result_type (in our case
it is always int, but we want to be generic ;), so you can make pair_c<0,
double>, pair_c<1, SomeStruct> etc.). The at metafunction returns the type
which was in the vector at this position, in our case this type is pair_c.
Now we need to access the field type T. mpl::pair is defined as template
<class X, class Y> struct pair {
typedef X first;
typedef Y second;
};
so, the type of our datafield in pair_c is of type second. Therefore the
function nth_field returns reference to second.
In the function itself we use the static_cast operator to calculate the
offset to our datafield within the class. And then we return the the field
contained there.
Below is the full listing I used to test and compile the scenario:
linear_inh_test.h
---------- START -------------------
#ifndef __OM_LINEAR_INHERITANCE_TEST_H__ #define
__OM_LINEAR_INHERITANCE_TEST_H__
#include <boost/mpl/at.hpp>
#include <boost/mpl/int.hpp>
#include <boost/mpl/pair.hpp>
#include <boost/mpl/lambda.hpp>
#include <boost/mpl/inherit.hpp>
#include <boost/mpl/identity.hpp>
#include <boost/mpl/placeholders.hpp>
#include <boost/mpl/inherit_linearly.hpp>
template<int N, class T>
struct pair_c : boost::mpl::pair<boost::mpl::int_<N>, T> {
T dataField;
};
template<class Seq>
struct linear_inherited :
boost::mpl::inherit_linearly
<
Seq
, boost::mpl::inherit<boost::mpl::_1, boost::mpl::_2>
>::type
{
template<long N>
typename boost::mpl::at_c<Seq, N>::type::second& nth_field()
{
typedef typename boost::mpl::at_c<Seq, N>::type* ptr_type;
ptr_type ptr = static_cast<ptr_type>(this);
return ptr->dataField;
}
};
#endif
__________ END ___________________
main.cpp
---------- START -------------------
#include "linear_inh_test.h"
#include <cassert>
#include <boost/mpl/vector.hpp>
int main()
{
using namespace boost;
typedef mpl::vector<pair_c<0, int>, pair_c<1, int>, pair_c<2, int> >
my_vector;
linear_inherited<my_vector> test_instance;
int& ref0 = test_instance.nth_field<0>();
ref0 = 0;
int& ref1 = test_instance.nth_field<1>();
ref1 = 1;
int& ref2 = test_instance.nth_field<2>();
ref2 = 2;
assert(
test_instance.nth_field<0>()
!= test_instance.nth_field<1>()
!= test_instance.nth_field<2>()
);
return 0;
}
__________ END ___________________
With Kind Regards,
Ovanes Markarian
On Tue, January 9, 2007 21:51, Khalil Shalish wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I created the following composite class using mpl::inherit_linearly:
>
> template <class T>
> struct DataField {
> T data;
> }
>
> typedef mpl::inherit_linearly<
> mpl::vector< int, int, int>
> mpl::inherit< DataField<_2>, _1 >
>> Int3Composite;
>
> Int3Composite int3comp;
>
> Since the type of each data field is an int, I cannot use the type of
> the field to access the
data in the field.
>
> Q: Is there a way to write a template (call it get_field) to access
> the data using numeric
position in the type sequence. Something like this:
>
> int field_0 = get_field<0>(in3comp); //This returns the first int data
> field. int field_1 =
get_field<1>(int3comp);
>
> I am very new to C++ template programming and any help on this will be
very much appreciated.
>
> Thank you,
> Khalil Shalish
> kshalish_at_[hidden]
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>
With Kind Regards,
Ovanes
_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users_at_[hidden]
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net