Re: [Boost-users] Preferred syntax on GCC 4.0

From: Austin Shoemaker (ashoemaker_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-12 18:15:53

It was indeed a type issue. In creating a test file to send to you, I
discovered that there is nothing wrong with Boost, it was a naming
conflict with libc's signal(...). When I use either boost::signal or
remove the header that defines libc signal, the problem disappears.

Thank you for your help.

Best,
Austin

On 2/12/07, Sebastien Fortier <sebastien.fortier_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>  Could it be that you forgot an include or a using namespace directive?
>  Usually when I get "ISO C++ forbids delcaration of sometype with no type" I
> simply forgot to include the type.
>
>  Pedro Lamarão wrote:
>  Austin Shoemaker escreveu:
>
>
>  I can't find this in the documentation or on the web, surprisingly, so
> I thought I'd ask here:
>
> Should I be able to use "preferred syntax" with boost::signal using
> GCC 4.0? I get "ISO C++ forbids delcaration of 'signal' with no type"
> errors, and portable syntax works fine.
>
>  Can you provide the problematic code with compiler output?
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Sébastien Fortier
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>