Re: [Boost-users] [signals] thread_safe_signals feature-complete

From: Gottlob Frege (gottlobfrege_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-19 21:51:29

On 2/19/07, Peter Dimov <pdimov_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> I know. The question was whether the "no calls after disconnect" guarantee
> is valuable, and disconnecting in a destructor was given as a motivating
> example. I was just explaining that the guarantee doesn't buy much since
> disconnecting in a destructor is still unsafe.
>

Is it?  If we are using weak_ptrs?

Tony