|
Boost Users : |
From: Pavol Droba (droba_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-20 15:52:47
Hi,
Meryl Silverburgh wrote:
> On 2/20/07, Pavol Droba <droba_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> Pavol,
>>>
>>> Thank for your help. I thought you said 'The question marks can be
>>> substituted by
>>> string_split::value_type'. In one of our previous exchange.
>>>
>>> That is why I am using 'string_split::value_type' not
>>> 'iterator_range<string::iterator>'
>>>
>>> Sorry if I mis-understand what you teach me.
>>>
>> No worries.
>>
>> There is no problem with using string_split::value_type. It is just
>> a typedef to iterator_range<string::iterator>. In your code, you
>> misplaced it with string_split itself.
>>
>
> I change the integer_compare class to use iterator_range<string::iterator>&.
>
> And I am trying to loop thru the iterator_range inside the function()
> of integer_compare:
>
> bool operator() (const iterator_range<string::iterator>& a,
>
> const iterator_range<string::iterator>& b) {
> cout << "calling integer_compare " << endl;
>
> // expect to print out "", "1", "1", "2" for a string of "/1/1/2"
> for (string::iterator sitr = a.begin(); sitr != a.end(); sitr++) {
>
> cout << copy_range<std::string>(*sitr) << endl;
>
> }
> return true;
> }
>
Please, see the iterator_range documentation:
http://www.boost.org/libs/range/doc/utility_class.html#iter_range
Although you changed the names of parameters, you are still using
iterator_range as if it was a split_iterator.
copy_range copies a *range* to a given container. when you dereference
a string::iterator, you will not get a *range*, rather a single character.
Instead of "for" loop you should use just
cout << copy_range<std::string>(a) << endl;
Regards,
Pavol.
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net