Re: [Boost-users] [signals] thread-safe post-disconnect() cleanup

From: Frank Mori Hess (fmhess_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-24 12:15:31

On Saturday 24 February 2007 11:59 am, Peter Dimov wrote:
> Frank Mori Hess wrote:
> > I wasn't planning on dropping support for automatic tracking of
> > signals, I don't see that dropping it would make things any less
> > confusing for the user.
>
> Automatic tracking is nice, but is it workable, if the goal is for the
> 'new' signals to become part of the C++ standard library one day? It
> requires cooperation from the function objects, and this is hard to
> achieve in practice.

Hmm, well I suppose it wouldn't be too bad if we just provided an 
overloaded version slot::track that accepted a signal as an argument.

-- 
Frank