|
Boost Users : |
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-05 11:35:26
I don't see any problem with the code snippet. Maybe you want
to make small test which we run here.
Robert Ramey
gast128 wrote:
> Robert Ramey <ramey <at> rrsd.com> writes:
>
>> To my mind, the best solution is to use smart_pointers
>> and serialize them.
>
> Hello Robert,
>
> this gives me another problem (crash) when using an object consisting
> of two shared pointers:
>
> struct Bla
> {
> template <class Archive>
> void serialize(Archive& ar, const unsigned int /*version*/)
> {
> ar & BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(m_ptr);
> ar & BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(m_ptr1);
> }
>
> boost::shared_ptr<int> m_ptr;
> boost::shared_ptr<int> m_ptr1;
> };
>
> If I try to load this, and let if fail while loading the second
> shared pointer (because the file is corrupt) it crashes when using
> the 'delete_created_pointers' option in the catch handler due to the
> fact that the shared pointer wants to cleanup an already deleted
> pointer. Leaving this option out does not crash it anymore, but
> results in some memory leaks.
>
> But maybe I am taking now the serialziation library beyond its design
> limits. These are all of course exceptional case.
>
> wkr,
> me
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net