Boost logo

Boost Users :

From: Seweryn Habdank-Wojewódzki (habdank_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-11 11:57:58


Hi again

> Joaquín M? López Mu?oz wrote:
>> If you switched to a node-based container like vg. std::list
>> I guess you would actually see some improvement when using the
>> pool allocator.

I have switched to list using fast_pool_allocator and still nothing is
improved. I do not demand any improvement, because algorithm can be slow.

But still I am looking for design guides, when pool allocator will be better
than standard one. Maybe many "erase" operation is a key for success of
pool allocator?

Best regards.

-- 
|\/\/|   Seweryn Habdank-Wojewódzki
 \/\/

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net