Boost Users :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Iliyan Georgiev (iliyan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-23 19:51:12

Next message: Eric Niebler: "Re: [Boost-users] BOOST_FOREACH and iterating by reference"
Previous message: Rene Rivera: "Re: [Boost-users] Suppress generation of unversioned .lib"
Next in thread: Rene Rivera: "Re: [Boost-users] [Win32] Do I need both versioned and unversioned boost libs?"
Reply: Rene Rivera: "Re: [Boost-users] [Win32] Do I need both versioned and unversioned boost libs?"

I noticed that the build process generates duplicate .lib files - versioned
and unversioned. Is there a redundancy and do I need both in order
auto-linking to work properly? If so, which type is redundant?

Thanks in advance!

text/html attachment: attachment

Next message: Eric Niebler: "Re: [Boost-users] BOOST_FOREACH and iterating by reference"
Previous message: Rene Rivera: "Re: [Boost-users] Suppress generation of unversioned .lib"
Next in thread: Rene Rivera: "Re: [Boost-users] [Win32] Do I need both versioned and unversioned boost libs?"
Reply: Rene Rivera: "Re: [Boost-users] [Win32] Do I need both versioned and unversioned boost libs?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net