Re: [Boost-users] [work] Re: [1.34.0] building on cygwin fails out of the box

From: Arthur Carlsson (arthur_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-28 02:11:15

That's exactly the error I get after bjam has been running for forever. If I
run the same command again the build process resumes where it failed with
the same result.

Regards.
- Arthur

On 5/28/07, chun ping wang <cablepuff_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> heres what i got....
> ......
> common.copy/usr/boost-install/include/boost-1_34/boost/type_traits/is_member_fu
> nction_pointer.hpp
> common.copy/usr/boost-install/include/boost-1_34/boost/type_traits/is_member_ob
> ject_pointer.hpp
> common.copy/usr/boost-install/include/boost-1_34/boost/type_traits/is_member_po
> inter.hpp
>   50470 [main] bjamCygwin 3976 child_info::sync: wait failed, pid 3364,
> Win32 er
> ror 0
> 1238818 [main] bjamCygwin 3976 fork: child -1 - died waiting for longjmp
> before
> initialization, retry 10, exit code 0x1000000, errno 11
> vfork: Resource temporarily unavailable
>      36 [main] bjamCygwin 3364 child_copy: data read copy failed,
> 0x417000..0x41
> 8D70, done 0, windows pid 3364, Win32 error 5
>  698251 [main] bjamCygwin 3364 fixup_mmaps_after_fork: VirtualQueryEx
> failed for
>  MAP_PRIVATE address 0x7FEF0000, Win32 error 5
>  774402 [main] bjamCygwin 3364
> C:\cygwin\usr\src\boost_1_34_0\bjamCygwin.exe: **
> * fatal error - recreate_mmaps_after_fork_failed
> Not all Boost libraries built properly.
>
> On 5/25/07, Bobby Ward < bobbyrward_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > If I run 'bjam -n install' I get a single process.  After 7 minutes and
> > 197MB of memory it prints
> > ...patience...
> > ...patience...
> >
> > Which kind of negates the purpose of the message. :-/
> >
> > After another minute it starts printing the copy commands and finishes
> > in under a minute.
> >
> > I'll try running "bjam -n -a" when I have a couple of hours to kill.
> >
> >
> > On 5/24/07, Rene Rivera < grafikrobot_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Bobby Ward wrote:
> > > > I've noticed the same symptoms.  Both processes using > 150M of
> > > memory.
> > >
> > > If it's the hardlink/copy... Could someone with cygwin do a "bjam -n
> > > -a"
> > > and try one of the hardlink/copy commands manually to see if it really
> > > is just the command. And perhaps find out why.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
> > > -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
> > > -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift- software.com
> > > -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Boost-users mailing list
> > > Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> > > http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Bobby Ward
> > ------------------------------
> > bobbyrward_at_[hidden]
> >
> > http://www.bobbyrward.com
> > http://combustion.sourceforge.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Boost-users mailing list
> > Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> > http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>