|
Boost Users : |
From: Cliff Green (cliffg_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-27 12:27:20
> I don't think binary archives are going to be smaller
>than the equivalent
> text archive. native binary archives are built for
>speed, text for
> portability, and xml to satisfy those who feel they need
>it.
I generally agree, but I wouldn't be surprised if binary
archives are smaller than text archives for everything but
unusual cases. It may not be a significant percentage
difference, and of course without some objective test
cases I'm just guessing.
And of course we need to better define the specifics of a
"binary archive" - I'll follow-up with a reply to your
next e-mail.
Cliff
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net