Re: [Boost-users] boost::lambda::bind - a better name?

From: Kirit Sælensminde (kirit.saelensminde_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-07-10 00:24:58

Maciek Godek wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better if boost::lambda::bind was named
> boost::lambda::call (or boost::lambda::eval, to make it more lispish),
> in order to:

I think you can make a better argument for calling it papply as it is a 
generalised partial application function, but personally I find the name 
bind OK.

K