Re: [Boost-users] program_options: documentation dead end

From: Bryan Green (bgreen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-07-27 15:16:00

"Chris Weed" writes:
> > Vladimir, have you had a chance to look at the patch I submitted to the
> > mailing list for program_options optional ("implicit") arguments?  Do you
> > have any issues with the solution?  It would be great if this feature could
> > get incorporated into boost.  I'd like to know what you think of it.
> >
> 
> YOu might want to submit it to trac, so it isn't lost on the mailing list.

Thanks for the suggestion.
I just tried that and got rejected:

Internal Error
Submission rejected as potential spam (Akismet says content is spam)

????

-Bryan