Boost Users :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-02 13:39:03

Next message: Gennadiy Rozental: "Re: [Boost-users] Boost.Test Documentation"
Previous message: Caleb Epstein: "Re: [Boost-users] [Important] Boost Subversion repository is now online"
Next in thread: Jens Seidel: "Re: [Boost-users] [tests] Signals not well covered in unit tests (in contrast to exceptions)?"
Reply: Jens Seidel: "Re: [Boost-users] [tests] Signals not well covered in unit tests (in contrast to exceptions)?"

> "Jens Seidel" <jensseidel_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> news:20070726151640.GA19199_at_imkf-pc073.imkf.tu-freiberg.de...
> Hi,
>
> I have the following problem with a C++ project on Linux using the
> Boost.test framework:

Can you write simple example that show the problem?

Gennadiy

Next message: Gennadiy Rozental: "Re: [Boost-users] Boost.Test Documentation"
Previous message: Caleb Epstein: "Re: [Boost-users] [Important] Boost Subversion repository is now online"
Next in thread: Jens Seidel: "Re: [Boost-users] [tests] Signals not well covered in unit tests (in contrast to exceptions)?"
Reply: Jens Seidel: "Re: [Boost-users] [tests] Signals not well covered in unit tests (in contrast to exceptions)?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net