Boost logo

Boost Users :

From: Uwe Schuster (Uwe.Schuster_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-15 05:21:05


> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden]]On Behalf Of Gennadiy
> Rozental
> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 5:39 AM
> To: boost-users_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Boost.Test Documentation
>

> "Yann Golanski" <yann_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> news:20070814084453.GB60576_at_kierun.org...
> > For example:
> >
> http://www.patmedia.net/~rogeeff/html/utf/user-guide/runtime-config/reference.html
> > In "report_level", the levels are indicated as no, confirm,
> short and
> > detaled -- the latter should be details.
>
> Actually it's "detailed". Fixed anyway

On this page (report_level) the "Command line argument name" seems to be wrong.
Also on the "detect_memory_leak" page.

Why the list of parameters on the "Runtime parameters reference page" consists of the command line argument names? Shouldn't it be the full names instead?

Uwe.
 

***
The information in this e-mail is confidential and intended solely for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender by return e-mail delete this e-mail and refrain from any disclosure or action based on the information.
***


Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net