Re: [Boost-users] Boost.Test Documentation

From: Uwe Schuster (Uwe.Schuster_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-15 05:21:05

> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden]]On Behalf Of Gennadiy
> Rozental
> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 5:39 AM
> To: boost-users_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Boost.Test Documentation
> 

> "Yann Golanski" <yann_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
> news:20070814084453.GB60576_at_kierun.org...
> > For example:
> > 
> http://www.patmedia.net/~rogeeff/html/utf/user-guide/runtime-config/reference.html
> > In "report_level", the levels are indicated as no, confirm, 
> short and
> > detaled -- the latter should be details.
> 
> Actually it's "detailed". Fixed anyway

On this page (report_level) the "Command line argument name" seems to be wrong. 
Also on the "detect_memory_leak" page.

Why the list of parameters on the "Runtime parameters reference page" consists of the command line argument names? Shouldn't it be the full names instead?	

Uwe.
 

***
The information in this e-mail is confidential and intended solely for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed.  If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender by return e-mail delete this e-mail and refrain from any disclosure or action based on the information.
***