|
Boost Users : |
From: gast128 (gast128_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-15 11:48:16
>Robert Ramey <ramey <at> rrsd.com> writes:
>
> gast128 wrote:
>
> Problem is your point of view assumes that one compiler in particular
> has no warnings which should be ignored in any particular case.
>
> This assumption is not true.
Huh did I say that? I only said that if the library does not solve them, we
have to work around them.
It is not said that we disable every warning, but only the non harmful ones
like:
- unreferenced arguments
- conditional expression is constant
Leaves open the dangerous one (e.g. variables used without initialization) I
hope those not to found in a library.
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net