Re: [Boost-users] [review] Review of Unordered library begins today December 7

From: Daniel James (daniel_james_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-12-08 05:34:44

chun ping wang wrote:
>
> I do not think it should be accepted, and my only small gripe with it 
> its how the library is organize. Most boost library have "boost" as 
> the top folder for organization of jam file and jam.v2...., when I 
> used unordered library, unordered seems to be like the top folder 
> structure...thats my only gripe. Its small but it destroys the 
> uniformity of boost library".
> Clearer words.. when you unzip boost library. boost is top level 
> structure.
> When you unzip unordered library, it is unordered --> boost --> 
> unordered....

That's just an artefact of the way I packaged the library. While 
developing it I've been storing it in a separate directory from boost, 
and using boost.build to handle this. If accepted into boost it will 
follow the same directory structure as the rest of boost.

Thanks for the review,

Daniel