Re: [Boost-users] [review] Review of Unordered library started December 7 and still running!

From: chun ping wang (cablepuff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-12-13 00:23:33

actually off topic. I realize that if unordered gets in than we need to
update boost assign to add support for unordered set and unordered map. It
makes it more sweet.

On Dec 11, 2007 12:37 PM, Ion Gaztañaga <igaztanaga_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> The formal review of the Unordered library started December 7, we have a
> few nice reviews, but they are not enough. If you are interested in the
> library (and I *know* you are), please take some time to review it. This
> is the info you need to do a review:
>
> *Description*:
>
> An implementation of the unordered containers specified in TR1, with
> most of the changes from the recent draft standards.
>
> *Author*:
>
> Daniel James
>
> *Download*:
>
>
> http://www.boost-consulting.com/vault/index.php?action=downloadfile&filename=unordered.zip&directory=Containers
>
> The documentation is in the zip file.  I've put documentation online here:
>
> http://igaztanaga.drivehq.com/unordered
>
> http://tinyurl.com/yw8wjp
>
>
> What to include in Review Comments
> ==================================
>
> Your comments may be brief or lengthy, but basically the Review Manager
> needs your evaluation of the library. If you identify problems along
> the way, please note if they are minor, serious, or showstoppers.
>
> Here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:
>
> * What is your evaluation of the design?
> * What is your evaluation of the implementation?
> * What is your evaluation of the documentation?
> * What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness of the library?
> * Did you try to use the library? With what compiler?
>    Did you have any problems?
> * How much effort did you put into your evaluation?
>    A glance? A quick reading? In-depth study?
> * Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain?
>
> And finally, every review should answer this question:
>
> * Do you think the library should be accepted as a Boost library?
>    Be sure to say this explicitly so that your other comments
>    don't obscure your overall opinion.
>
> Ion Gaztañaga
>
> - Review Manager -
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>