Boost logo

Boost Users :

From: damny_at_[hidden]
Date: 2007-12-27 03:43:34


ahh,

very nice. please excuse my thick-wittedness.

but ... what if, if i would like to add an additional, unique key to my structure; a last update time, maybe.
  name-identifer-time >> value; valu1:=map[nme1], valu1:=map[idf1], valu1:=map[time1]
in this case bimap will not solve my problem and multiindex will be the best solution. is that right?
and for interest, how to solve the original problem in this case?

thnx
daniel

_____________________________________________________________________
Der WEB.DE SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen!
http://smartsurfer.web.de/?mc=100071&distributionid=000000000066


Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net