Re: [Boost-users] formal review of Switch library ends tomorrow (Wednesday, January 9th) - reviews needed

From: Steven Watanabe (steven_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-10 20:53:29

AMDG

Tobias Schwinger <tschwinger <at> isonews2.com> writes:

> 
> Steven Watanabe wrote:
> > AMDG
> > 
> > Tobias Schwinger <tschwinger <at> isonews2.com> writes:
> > 
> >>> I don't think the comma operator
> >>> is a completely fool-proof way to detect void. 
> >> It is.
> >>
> >>> It could cause an
> >>> ambiguity if the other type also defines an overloaded comma operator.
> >> No, because the operator is binary and one operand can have a reserved 
> >> type which is only internally used by the test code.
> 
> I hope I haven't promised too much ...
> 
> > 
> > Ok.  Let's make this concrete.  Here is what I imagine:
> 
> <code>
> 
> Try the attached code - does it work for you?

No it doesn't.  None of the versions requiring implicit conversions
worked.  Did you by any chance compile with NDEBUG?

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe