Re: [Boost-users] "Re: Boost, HP-UX and gcc"

From: Boris Gubenko (Boris.Gubenko_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-02-21 16:19:37

I don't think John's fix in http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/42890 made 
it to 1.35. You migh want to apply it locally and see if it fixes your problem.

Thanks,
  Boris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <stacie_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost-users_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 3:36 PM
Subject: [Boost-users] "Re: Boost, HP-UX and gcc"

> I'm on 11.23 itanium using gcc 4.1.1 and the latest build of 1.35 beta
> (feb 21)
>
> With my setup, c++config,h indicates that the header wchar.h does exist,
> however gcc does *not* set _GLIBCPP_USE_WCHAR_T nor_GLIBCXX_USE_WCHAR_T.
>
> My build keeps throwing No WCHAR_MIN and WCHAR_MAX errors, and suggests
> that I adjust integer_traits<>.
> I was going to just let it slide but unfortunately I received this error
> while trying to build using the Unit Test framework. Since unit testing
> is my friend, I would really like to get this working.
>
> I tried a work-around from the boost mailing list, but the code that I
> found in my files was not quite like what he modified:
>
> *****
>                Added code at top of
>                bad header file: #ifdef hpux #include <wchar.h> #undef
>                WCHAR_MIN /* (wchar_t)0 */ #define WCHAR_MIN 0 #endif
>              * error simply changed
>                to:
> /home/mlinck/develop/api/tp-sources-trunk/boost_1_33_1/boost/regex/v4/regex_traits_defaults.hpp:94:28:
> error: missing binary operator before token "("
>              * tried a different workaround at the code where the error
>                is thrown. Noticed that broken code gets skipped for
>                HP_aCC compiler. Figure we can maybe get away with same
>                for gcc compiler:
>                        => #if !defined HP_aCC && !defined hpux
>
>      * seems to compile. Had to apply to
>        boost/regex/v4/perl_matcher.hpp as well
> ******
>
>
> How would I modify integer_traits<> ?  Since that is what is
> suggested......
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>