|
Boost Users : |
From: QbProg (tholag_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-03-01 09:10:46
It would be really usefoul to have something like that :)
Thank you
QbProg
>
> I have something in the dataflow library that I am planning to take in
> the direction you're suggesting. The current syntax allows something
> like this:
>
> FunctionOne = make_slot_selector<void (int, int)> ( &Implementor::ImplOne , i );
> FunctionTwo = make_slot_selector<bool (int)>( &Implementor::ImplTwo , &i);
>
> So it's not (yet) quite what you're looking for, but when the member
> function is not overloaded I don't think I need the signature to be
> specified explicitly, and can provide something like
>
> FunctionOne = make_slot_selector( &Implementor::ImplOne , i );
>
> But I haven't had time to try it yet :-) I was going to try to do one
> last push this weekend to get this lib submitted for review, maybe as
> a part of that effort I can give this a whirl.
>
> Stjepan
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>
>
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net