|
Boost Users : |
From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-08 11:16:17
Patrick Loney wrote:
>
>>> It is not possible to detect a spurious wake: if it was, then the
>>> implementation would resume waiting. However, spurious wakes should
> be
>>> rare occurrences.
>
> Does someone have time to give us a quick overview as to why spurious
> wakes may occur?
I'm sure you have typed "spurious wakeups" into google, and read
whatever is found?
If not, I'm afraid I only have a shameless plug:
http://vladimir_prus.blogspot.com/2005/07/spurious-wakeups.html
- Volodya
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net