|
Boost Users : |
From: John Femiani (JOHN.FEMIANI_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-29 11:16:34
>
> Do you have hard numbers about how much the user of
> iterator_facade affects compilation speed? Honest question --
> I also find it unfortunate that compilation time is not a
> priority for Boost.
>
> - Volodya
>
I second that -- I am quite curious about how much overhead various
headers/libraries impose when you include tham, and when you actually
use them (which seems to be a lot more expensive on msvc). Quick
compile-test-correct cycles are important to me. I don't know the best
way to even measure this.
In my code path and iterator_facade are both used a lot in my own
interfaces and if they are costing me significant build time I will
switch to just string/std::iterator in my headers.
-- John
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net