Re: [Boost-users] yet another logging library

From: John Torjo (john.groups_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-10 00:13:40

Nat Goodspeed wrote:
> Mojmir Svoboda wrote:
>
>   
>> oh, you almost got me there.. i did not considered these << operators
>> when designing. mainly because of their annoying syntax. i am simple
>> man i prefer that one of printf :) (or boost::format)
>>     
>
> Speaking only for myself -- I wouldn't use a logging library that didn't 
> support << operators.
>   
In my library's case, it's the user who decides what the logging syntax 
is. It can be << (default), or you can have your own syntax, like,
a % b % c ,etc.

Best,
John

-- 
http://John.Torjo.com -- C++ expert
http://blog.torjo.com
... call me only if you want things done right