|
Boost Users : |
From: Joel Falcou (joel.falcou_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-17 02:57:02
Hello,
I'm currently trying to write some transforms but I think I horribly
fail because I must be missing an important point.
Let's say we have a grammar defined as :
struct skeleton :
or_<
terminal< bp::_ >
, bitwise_and<skeleton,skeleton>
> {};
What I need to do is build a type out of a given expression. This type
is in fact a structure containing a tuple of class that represents MPI
process. So my idea was to write transform that do the following :
* for terminals, extract the argument (which is in fact a functor class)
and create a process network class instanciation with the argument and a
PID (basically a mpl::long_<>).
* for the & operator, transform the left and right argument, and build
the tuple out of both results by merging the contents of both into a
unique process network.
My biggest concern is to have the PID value to be kept across transform
call and correctly increased for each terminal. To do so, am I forced to
use fold (or fold_tree cause in the real code I have more than the sole
& operator) or is there a simple way to say transform left and right and
get the resulting types ?
Then, how is State kept through fold_tree or transform iteration ?
Should I kept the PID current value in an external parameters ?
Thanks in advance.
PS : if more detailed code is needed, I'll try to see what can be
publicly dispatched here.
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net