Boost Users :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-08-01 05:15:28

Next message: John C. Femiani: "[Boost-users] Is there/ was there ever a compile-time rational in boost?"
Previous message: Markus Werle: "Re: [Boost-users] [proto] latest code and docs?"
In reply to: Andrej van der Zee: "Re: [Boost-users] [PATCH] boost_1.36 beta on AIX 5.3 with gcc 4.2.4: Compile errors in math"

Andrej van der Zee wrote:
> Hi Watanabe-san,
>
>
>> Please submit a patch.
>
> There were more of these errors with identical solution. See
> attachment.

Thanks: I supect this is a symptom of a potentially wider problem, and I'm
going to have to uglify all the functions in the header *and* in the source
files to be sure this stays fixed. I'm testing that change now.

BTW, this wasn't an issue in 1.35 because that code didn't exist then: it's
only new stuff that has the problem, even so...

John..

Next message: John C. Femiani: "[Boost-users] Is there/ was there ever a compile-time rational in boost?"
Previous message: Markus Werle: "Re: [Boost-users] [proto] latest code and docs?"
In reply to: Andrej van der Zee: "Re: [Boost-users] [PATCH] boost_1.36 beta on AIX 5.3 with gcc 4.2.4: Compile errors in math"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net