Boost Users :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Markus Werle (numerical.simulation_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-08-11 02:55:29

Next message: joel falcou: "Re: [Boost-users] Concept check vs enable_if"
Previous message: Andrea Denzler: "[Boost-users] R: [boost.regex]Does boost:u32regexrecognize theunicode named blocks like "\p{IsBasicLatin}"?"
In reply to: David Abrahams: "Re: [Boost-users] [python|1.36_beta] Why am I forced to define BOOST_PYTHON_STATIC_LIB?"
Next in thread: Markus Werle: "Re: [Boost-users] [python|1.36_beta] Why am I forced to define BOOST_PYTHON_STATIC_LIB?"
Reply: Markus Werle: "Re: [Boost-users] [python|1.36_beta] Why am I forced to define BOOST_PYTHON_STATIC_LIB?"

David Abrahams <dave <at> boostpro.com> writes:

> on Tue Aug 05 2008, Markus Werle <numerical.simulation-AT-web.de> wrote:
> [...]
> > Am I missing something?
>
> Probably not. Can you open a ticket at http://svn.boost.org ? A patch
> would be very, very much appreciated too!

http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/trac/boost/newticket yields:

----
Error: Not Found
No handler matched request to /trac/boost/newticket
TracGuide â€” The Trac User and Administration Guide 
----
Do I need a Trac/SVN Userid?
Markus

Next message: joel falcou: "Re: [Boost-users] Concept check vs enable_if"
Previous message: Andrea Denzler: "[Boost-users] R: [boost.regex]Does boost:u32regexrecognize theunicode named blocks like "\p{IsBasicLatin}"?"
In reply to: David Abrahams: "Re: [Boost-users] [python|1.36_beta] Why am I forced to define BOOST_PYTHON_STATIC_LIB?"
Next in thread: Markus Werle: "Re: [Boost-users] [python|1.36_beta] Why am I forced to define BOOST_PYTHON_STATIC_LIB?"
Reply: Markus Werle: "Re: [Boost-users] [python|1.36_beta] Why am I forced to define BOOST_PYTHON_STATIC_LIB?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net