Re: [Boost-users] [spirit2] push_back not fully understood - vc8 rejects code, why?

From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-08-27 11:48:15

Markus Werle wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> Though I appreciate simple examples in the docs it is indeed
> helpful to have examples with fully qualified names.
> I am having hard times figuring out which versions of "_1", "at_c", etc.
> are in use. the fusion/phoenix/proto/mpl chaos is hard to keep track of.
> In summary: using declaratives are nice for toy examples but drive
> you nuts, once you #include more files and have ADL destroying the idyll
> of simplicity. 
> 
> Below is a piece of code that nearly compiles. One line has a problem:
> A semantic action, namely a push_back fails under vc8 and the error
> message is far from being helpful.
> So could you please be so nice and give me some hint on how to fix this.
> 
> (BTW, Joel: "iter+30" directives from the spirit2 examples are
> assert-catched by the VC8 debugging STL, so I changed that part 
> a little bit to first check the distance and doing iterator 
> arithmetics afterwards. See below.)

Hi Markus, care to move this to the Spirit list?

Regards,
-- 
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boostpro.com
http://spirit.sf.net