Boost logo

Boost Users :

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [test] testing protected/private methods out of test suits
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-22 14:53:35


AMDG

Robert Mecklenburg wrote:
> I would swear that the standard indicated that public/private had no
> effect on visibility, just accessibility. That is, changing a
> symbol's access from private to public did not change the meaning of a
> program. Stroustrup uses such language in the D&E of C++.
>

If it is public in some places and private in others, it
violates the one definition rule and all bets are off.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe


Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net