Re: [Boost-users] It is possible to build a static version of boost for the MACOS

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] It is possible to build a static version of boost for the MACOS
From: Sachin Garg (schngrg_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-03 13:54:30

passing link=static to bjam is not the same as passing -static to
linked, is this where the confusion is?

On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 7:00 PM, kittymaguire
<katherine_maguire_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> When I put -static into the linker options, I get a lot of linker errors. So
> I don't think a static version is possible on the MAC.
>
> How can I built each library that I need into a framework for the MAC?
>
>
> Vladimir Prus-3 wrote:
>>
>> kittymaguire wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I have tried to build the boost libraries on the MacOS as a static
>>> library
>>> by giving bjam the --buid_type=static but it still built the dynamic
>>> version
>>> of the libraries.
>>
>> I don't think either "bjam --help" or getting started docs, or Boost.Build
>> docs
>> mention
>>
>>         --build_type=static
>>
>> Use link=static, instead.
>>
>> - Volodya
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Boost-users mailing list
>> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
>> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/It-is-possible-to-build-a-static-version-of-boost-for-the-MACOS-tp19795883p19797786.html
> Sent from the Boost - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>