Boost logo

Boost Users :

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Linker error with boost_1_36_0
From: DDBeatty_at_[hidden]
Date: 2008-10-13 10:19:48


Thanks for the info. I hadn't run across that before. I am embarrassed
that I have let myself fall that far behind.

If anyone is reading along and is suffering from the same ignorance I do, I
found another nice article on the subject of these two:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa289170.aspx

Thanks,

Doug Beatty

                                                                           
             Adam Merz
             <adammerz_at_hotmail
             .com> To
             Sent by: boost-users_at_[hidden]
             boost-users-bounc cc
             es_at_lists.boost.or
             g Subject
                                       Re: [Boost-users] Linker error with
                                       boost_1_36_0
             10/10/2008 05:34
             PM
                                                                           
                                                                           
             Please respond to
             boost-users_at_lists
                .boost.org
                                                                           
                                                                           

DDBeatty writes:
> I know it was your opinion. I am just interested in it because DLL's are
> something I just do. I was wondering what reasons you may have for
> preferring not to use them.
>
> To that end, I may be displaying some inexcusable ignorance but what is
> WPO?
>
> I don't want to get into a long discussion about this. Just curiosity in
> passing.

WPO is Whole Program Optimization, enabled in MSVC with the /GL compiler
option
(http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/0zza0de8.aspx) and the /LTCG
linker
option (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/xbf3tbeh.aspx). For code
that
benefits especially well from inlining, it can be a great boon to
performance.
That alone is enough for me to use static libs on Windows when I can; PGO
(Profile Guided Optimization) only furthers my opinion. :-)

Another factor for me is the size of .dlls. My boost_regex-vc90-mt-1_36.dll
is
696KB; if I'm only using half the functionality in boost.regex, I don't
want to
distribute the functionality I'm not using with my application.

_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users_at_[hidden]
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

-----------------------------------------
This e-mail and any attachments are intended only for the
individual or company to which it is addressed and may contain
information which is privileged, confidential and prohibited from
disclosure or unauthorized use under applicable law. If you are
not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified
that any use, dissemination, or copying of this e-mail or the
information contained in this e-mail is strictly prohibited by the
sender. If you have received this transmission in error, please
return the material received to the sender and delete all copies
from your system.


Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net