Boost Users :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [Math] Accuracy test failures on QNX 6.4.0
From: Niklas Angare (li51ckf02_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-21 15:35:13

Next message: Andrew Sutton: "Re: [Boost-users] std::vector and default constructor"
Previous message: peter_foelsche_at_[hidden]: "[Boost-users] std::vector and default constructor"
In reply to: John Maddock: "Re: [Boost-users] [Math] Accuracy test failures on QNX 6.4.0"
Next in thread: John Maddock: "Re: [Boost-users] [Math] Accuracy test failures on QNX 6.4.0"
Reply: John Maddock: "Re: [Boost-users] [Math] Accuracy test failures on QNX 6.4.0"

>>>> but on the off chance there's some issue with FPU exception flags
>>>> from previous calls messing things up, can you try the attached
>>>> boost/math/tools/config.hpp and see if it clears any of the test
>>>> failures?

That didn't appear to make a differance. The same tests fail with it as
without.

The Ellint tests pass now, though. Considering the nature of the platform
bug I guess that may just be due to the code moving around.

Next message: Andrew Sutton: "Re: [Boost-users] std::vector and default constructor"
Previous message: peter_foelsche_at_[hidden]: "[Boost-users] std::vector and default constructor"
In reply to: John Maddock: "Re: [Boost-users] [Math] Accuracy test failures on QNX 6.4.0"
Next in thread: John Maddock: "Re: [Boost-users] [Math] Accuracy test failures on QNX 6.4.0"
Reply: John Maddock: "Re: [Boost-users] [Math] Accuracy test failures on QNX 6.4.0"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net